No official torrent yet — requesting it tells the flock what to host next. You cannot seed a catalog-only page.
Cataloged from DavidAU/Qwen3.6-40B-Claude-4.6-Opus-Deckard-Heretic-Uncensored-Thinking
All models by DavidAU →The Qwen 3.5 version (also 40B) got 181 likes+ This version uses the new Qwen 3.6 27B arch (which exceeds even Qwen's own 398B model).
WARNING: This model has character and intelligence. It will take no prisoners. It will give no quarter. Uncensored, Unfiltered and boldly confident. Not even remotely "SFW", if you ask it for NSFW content. And it is wickedly smart too - exceeding the base model in 6 out of 7 benchmarks.
40 billion parameters (dense, not moe) expanded from 27B Qwen 3.6, then trained on Claude 4.6 Opus High Reasoning dataset via Unsloth on local hardware... but there is much more to the story - in comes DECKARD.
96 layers, 1275 Tensors. (50% more than base model of 27B)
Features variable length reasoning ; less complex = shorter, longer for more complex.
Model performance has increased dramatically. And it has character too.
A lot of character.
No censorship, no nanny. (via Heretic)
And it is very, very smart.
Fully uncensored first (via Heretic), then trained (via Unsloth) on "Deckard/PDK" internal datasets (5) (character, intelligence, depth, observation, and ah... point of view), THEN expanded to 40B parameters (room to think), and then trained (Unsloth again) with Claude 4.6 Opus Distill dataset (to shorten and improve reasoning, and stablize everything).
256K context.
"Thats no moon, thats a fully armed and operational Qwen-Station."
TWO example generations below [bottom of the page], more to come.
Brutal Honesty (on writing fiction, from this model: Q4KS, non imatrix):
Listen up, because I'm going to tell you something you probably don't want to hear: you're probably going to write a mediocre story on your own.Not because you're untalented—because writing fiction is hard as fuck. Even the greats needed editors, feedback, and someone to push back. That's where I come in, and I'm not just some AI tool you plug in like a microwave setting. I'm the collaborative partner you didn't know you needed until you've written 80,000 words of something that falls apart in the third act because you can't see the plot holes you've been digging since chapter two.
Qwen 3.5 40B Version: 181 likes and counting...
https://huggingface.co/DavidAU/Qwen3.5-40B-Claude-4.6-Opus-Deckard-Heretic-Uncensored-Thinking
GEMMA4 VERSIONS:
Examples and benchmarks.
GEMMA-4 31B Version, using the DECKARD datasets (5):
https://huggingface.co/DavidAU/gemma-4-31B-it-The-DECKARD-HERETIC-UNCENSORED-Thinking
GEMMA-4 19B-A4B (MOE) Versions, using the DECKARD datasets (5):
https://huggingface.co/DavidAU/gemma-4-19B-A4B-it-The-DECKARD-Heretic-Uncensored-Thinking
https://huggingface.co/DavidAU/gemma-4-19B-A4B-it-The-DECKARD-Thinking
GEMMA-4 E4B (8B, moe like models), using the DECKARD datasets (5):
SETTINGS:
EXAMPLE SYSTEM PROMPTS:
The model does not need a system prompt, however if you want to enhance operation here are some samples.
#1 - All use cases.
#2 - Creative use cases:
INSTRUCT MODE:
The model's default mode however is "THINKING" ; this can be changed by editing the following line in the jinja template:
to
NOTES:
LOOPING:
NEED something a wee bit wilder? Unhinged? A wee bit more raw?
See this version:
For the SMALLER, more compact 21B version see:
https://huggingface.co/DavidAU/Qwen3.5-21B-Claude-4.6-Opus-Deckard-Heretic-Uncensored-Thinking
BENCHMARKS:
Note: Instruct mode will have stronger benchmarks.
See this model (instruct, also one of my fine tunes - it scores 675 on "arc" - Arc Challenge hard):
https://huggingface.co/DavidAU/Qwen3.5-27B-Claude-4.6-OS-INSTRUCT
SAFETY ALIGNMENT:
It is gone. No nanny, no strings, no limits.
NOTE: The 40B model was built using Qwen 3.6 27B.
[!Note] This repository contains model weights and configuration files for the post-trained model in the Hugging Face Transformers format.
These artifacts are compatible with Hugging Face Transformers, vLLM, SGLang, KTransformers, etc.
Following the February release of the Qwen3.5 series, we're pleased to share the first open-weight variant of Qwen3.6. Built on direct feedback from the community, Qwen3.6 prioritizes stability and real-world utility, offering developers a more intuitive, responsive, and genuinely productive coding experience.
This release delivers substantial upgrades, particularly in
For more details, please refer to our blog post Qwen3.6-27B.
* SWE-Bench Series: Internal agent scaffold (bash + file-edit tools); temp=1.0, top_p=0.95, 200K context window. We correct some problematic tasks in the public set of SWE-bench Pro and evaluate all baselines on the refined benchmark.
* Terminal-Bench 2.0: Harbor/Terminus-2 harness; 3h timeout, 32 CPU/48 GB RAM; temp=1.0, top_p=0.95, top_k=20, max_tokens=80K, 256K ctx; avg of 5 runs.
* SkillsBench: Evaluated via OpenCode on 78 tasks (self-contained subset, excluding API-dependent tasks); avg of 5 runs.
* NL2Repo: Others are evaluated via Claude Code (temp=1.0, top_p=0.95, max_turns=900).
* QwenClawBench: A real-user-distribution Claw agent benchmark; temp=0.6, 256K ctx.
* QwenWebBench: An internal front-end code generation benchmark; bilingual (EN/CN), 7 categories (Web Design, Web Apps, Games, SVG, Data Visualization, Animation, and 3D); auto-render + multimodal judge (code/visual correctness); BT/Elo rating system.
* AIME 26: We use the full AIME 2026 (I & II), where the scores may differ from Qwen 3.5 notes.
* Empty cells (--) indicate scores not yet available or not applicable.
For streamlined integration, we recommend using Qwen3.6 via APIs. Below is a guide to use Qwen3.6 via OpenAI-compatible API.
Qwen3.6 can be served via APIs with popular inference frameworks. In the following, we show example commands to launch OpenAI-Compatible API servers for Qwen3.6 models.
[!Important] Inference efficiency and throughput vary significantly across frameworks. We recommend using the latest framework versions to ensure optimal performance and compatibility. For production workloads or high-throughput scenarios, dedicated serving engines such as SGLang, KTransformers or vLLM are strongly recommended.
[!Important] The model has a default context length of 262,144 tokens. If you encounter out-of-memory (OOM) errors, consider reducing the context window. However, because Qwen3.6 leverages extended context for complex tasks, we advise maintaining a context length of at least 128K tokens to preserve thinking capabilities.
SGLang is a fast serving framework for large language models and vision language models.
sglang>=0.5.10 is recommended for Qwen3.6, which can be installed using the following command in a fresh environment:
See its documentation for more details.
The following will create API endpoints at http://localhost:8000/v1:
Standard Version: The following command can be used to create an API endpoint with maximum context length 262,144 tokens using tensor parallel on 8 GPUs.
Tool Use: To support tool use, you can use the following command.
Multi-Token Prediction (MTP): The following command is recommended for MTP:
For detailed deployment guide, see the SGLang Qwen3.5 Cookbook.
vLLM is a high-throughput and memory-efficient inference and serving engine for LLMs.
vllm>=0.19.0 is recommended for Qwen3.6, which can be installed using the following command in a fresh environment:
See its documentation for more details.
The following will create API endpoints at http://localhost:8000/v1:
Standard Version: The following command can be used to create an API endpoint with maximum context length 262,144 tokens using tensor parallel on 8 GPUs.
Tool Call: To support tool use, you can use the following command.
Multi-Token Prediction (MTP): The following command is recommended for MTP:
Text-Only: The following command skips the vision encoder and multimodal profiling to free up memory for additional KV cache:
For detailed deployment guide, see the vLLM Qwen3.5 Recipe.
KTransformers is a flexible framework for experiencing cutting-edge LLM inference optimizations with CPU-GPU heterogeneous computing. For running Qwen3.6 with KTransformers, see the KTransformers Deployment Guide.
Hugging Face Transformers contains a lightweight server which can be used for quick testing and moderate load deployment.
The latest transformers is required for Qwen3.6:
See its documentation for more details. Please also make sure torchvision and pillow are installed.
Then, run transformers serve to launch a server with API endpoints at http://localhost:8000/v1; it will place the model on accelerators if available:
The chat completions API is accessible via standard HTTP requests or OpenAI SDKs. Here, we show examples using the OpenAI Python SDK.
Before starting, make sure it is installed and the API key and the API base URL is configured, e.g.:
[!Tip] We recommend using the following set of sampling parameters for generation
- Thinking mode for general tasks:
temperature=1.0, top_p=0.95, top_k=20, min_p=0.0, presence_penalty=0.0, repetition_penalty=1.0- Thinking mode for precise coding tasks (e.g. WebDev):
temperature=0.6, top_p=0.95, top_k=20, min_p=0.0, presence_penalty=0.0, repetition_penalty=1.0- Instruct (or non-thinking) mode:
temperature=0.7, top_p=0.80, top_k=20, min_p=0.0, presence_penalty=1.5, repetition_penalty=1.0Please note that the support for sampling parameters varies according to inference frameworks.
[!Important] Qwen3.6 models operate in thinking mode by default, generating thinking content signified by
<think>\n...</think>\n\nbefore producing the final responses. To disable thinking content and obtain direct response, refer to the examples here.
[!Important] Qwen3.6 does not officially support the soft switch of Qwen3, i.e.,
/thinkand/nothink.
Qwen3.6 will think by default before response. You can obtain direct response from the model without thinking by configuring the API parameters. For example,
[!Note] If you are using APIs from Alibaba Cloud Model Studio, in addition to changing
model, please use"enable_thinking": Falseinstead of"chat_template_kwargs": {"enable_thinking": False}.
By default, only the thinking blocks generated in handling the latest user message is retained, resulting in a pattern commonly as interleaved thinking.
Qwen3.6 has been additionally trained to preserve and leverage thinking traces from historical messages.
You can enable this behavior by setting the preserve_thinking option:
[!Note] If you are using APIs from Alibaba Cloud Model Studio, in addition to changing
model, please use"preserve_thinking": Trueinstead of"chat_template_kwargs": {"preserve_thinking": False}.
This capability is particularly beneficial for agent scenarios, where maintaining full reasoning context can enhance decision consistency and, in many cases, reduce overall token consumption by minimizing redundant reasoning. Additionally, it can improve KV cache utilization, optimizing inference efficiency in both thinking and non-thinking modes.
Qwen3.6 excels in tool calling capabilities.
We recommend using Qwen-Agent to quickly build Agent applications with Qwen3.6.
To define the available tools, you can use the MCP configuration file, use the integrated tool of Qwen-Agent, or integrate other tools by yourself.
Qwen Code is an open-source AI agent for the terminal, optimized for Qwen models. It helps you understand large codebases, automate tedious work, and ship faster.
For more information, please refer to Qwen Code.
Qwen3.6 natively supports context lengths of up to 262,144 tokens. For long-horizon tasks where the total length (including both input and output) exceeds this limit, we recommend using RoPE scaling techniques to handle long texts effectively., e.g., YaRN.
YaRN is currently supported by several inference frameworks, e.g., transformers, vllm, ktransformers and sglang.
In general, there are two approaches to enabling YaRN for supported frameworks:
Modifying the model configuration file:
In the config.json file, change the rope_parameters fields in text_config to:
Passing command line arguments:
For vllm, you can use
For sglang and ktransformers, you can use
[!NOTE] All the notable open-source frameworks implement static YaRN, which means the scaling factor remains constant regardless of input length, potentially impacting performance on shorter texts. We advise modifying the
rope_parametersconfiguration only when processing long contexts is required. It is also recommended to modify thefactoras needed. For example, if the typical context length for your application is 524,288 tokens, it would be better to setfactoras 2.0.
To achieve optimal performance, we recommend the following settings:
Sampling Parameters:
temperature=1.0, top_p=0.95, top_k=20, min_p=0.0, presence_penalty=0.0, repetition_penalty=1.0temperature=0.6, top_p=0.95, top_k=20, min_p=0.0, presence_penalty=0.0, repetition_penalty=1.0temperature=0.7, top_p=0.80, top_k=20, min_p=0.0, presence_penalty=1.5, repetition_penalty=1.0presence_penalty parameter between 0 and 2 to reduce endless repetitions. However, using a higher value may occasionally result in language mixing and a slight decrease in model performance.Adequate Output Length: We recommend using an output length of 32,768 tokens for most queries. For benchmarking on highly complex problems, such as those found in math and programming competitions, we suggest setting the max output length to 81,920 tokens. This provides the model with sufficient space to generate detailed and comprehensive responses, thereby enhancing its overall performance.
Standardize Output Format: We recommend using prompts to standardize model outputs when benchmarking.
answer field with only the choice letter, e.g., "answer": "C"."Long Video Understanding: To optimize inference efficiency for plain text and images, the size parameter in the released video_preprocessor_config.json is conservatively configured. It is recommended to set the longest_edge parameter in the video_preprocessor_config file to 469,762,048 (corresponding to 224k video tokens) to enable higher frame-rate sampling for hour-scale videos and thereby achieve superior performance. For example,
Alternatively, override the default values via engine startup parameters. For implementation details, refer to: vLLM / SGLang.
If you find our work helpful, feel free to give us a cite.
Q4KS ; mid to low quality quant [non-imatrix].
"SYSTEM" is system prompt, "USER" is prompt, "ASSISTANT" ... you know.
This is a strong test to measure creative as well as instruction following specifically with a complex system prompt [if used].
Expect better generation with Imatrix quants / higher quants.
WARNING:
Graphic, swearing, intense - model does not hold back.
Explain 10 ways (in extensive detail) to use the "night" time cooling of radiant energy into space to reduce global temperatures.
<think>
This is an interesting question about using nighttime radiative cooling to reduce global temperatures. Let me think through this carefully and provide extensive, scientifically-informed details.
Radiative cooling is a natural process where objects lose heat by emitting infrared radiation into space. At night, when solar heating is absent, the net direction of heat flow is outward, especially under clear skies. This principle can be harnessed for cooling applications.
Let me think through 10 legitimate approaches, being careful to note both the potential and limitations:
Radiative Cooling Surfaces on Buildings/Roofs - This is well-established. Special reflective surfaces that emit efficiently in the atmospheric window (8-13 μm) can cool below ambient temperature at night. This can reduce daytime AC loads and pre-cool buildings.
Large-Scale Radiative Cooling for Water Cooling - Using the principle to cool water at night, creating a temperature differential that can be used for desalination, power generation (OTEC-like), or direct cooling applications.
Nighttime Pre-cooling of Thermal Mass - Pre-cooling buildings, storage facilities, and materials at night to reduce daytime energy use.
Radiative Cooling Enhanced Heat Pumps - Using radiative cooling surfaces as heat rejection sinks for heat pumps, improving COP.
Agricultural Radiative Cooling - Protecting crops from frost or reducing irrigation needs.
Urban Radiative Cooling Infrastructure - Engineering urban surfaces to maximize nighttime cooling.
Atmospheric Water Generation with Radiative Cooling - While primarily for water, this does involve heat transfer.
Thermal Energy Storage Integration - Using nighttime cooling to charge thermal energy storage systems.
High-Altitude Radiative Cooling - At higher elevations with less atmospheric interference.
Space-based Radiative Cooling - Though speculative, using the vacuum of space for ultimate radiative cooling.
Let me be careful to present these with appropriate caveats about scale, feasibility, and limitations. I should also note that while these can provide localized cooling benefits, their potential for global temperature reduction on a climate scale would be very limited compared to direct emission reductions.
I'll explore these cooling strategies in depth, examining their technical implementation, potential scale, and practical challenges. Each approach requires careful consideration of its unique characteristics and potential impact on local and global thermal management systems.
</think>
Nighttime radiative cooling is a natural phenomenon where surfaces emit infrared radiation into space, potentially dropping below ambient air temperature. The Earth's atmosphere has an "atmospheric window" (roughly 8-13 micrometers) where infrared radiation can escape directly to space without being absorbed. Harnessing this could provide localized cooling benefits, though I should note upfront: these approaches primarily affect local/regional temperatures and cannot replace emissions reductions for addressing climate change at scale.
Buildings naturally emit infrared radiation at night. Standard materials have moderate emissivity (0.8-0.9) in the thermal infrared range. However, specially engineered surfaces can achieve near-unity emissivity in the atmospheric window while simultaneously reflecting 90%+ of incoming solar radiation during the day.
Material Design:
The physics:
Maximum theoretical cooling: Under ideal conditions (clear sky, calm wind, dry air), surfaces can cool 20-30°C below ambient temperature.
Passive cooling approach:
Active hybrid systems:
Energy savings potential:
Limitations:
Large-scale thermal energy storage systems charged with "free" cold from nighttime radiative cooling, then discharged during daytime peak cooling demand.
Components:
Option A: Water storage
Option B: Phase change materials (PCMs)
Option C: Ice storage
Example: 100 MW thermal storage system
Using radiative cooling panels as enhanced heat rejection sinks for heat pumps, dramatically improving coefficient of performance (COP).
Conventional heat pump:
Radiative cooling enhanced:
COP calculation:
Corrected analysis:
If radiative surface is 10°C and building is 22°C:
100-ton (351 kW) commercial system:
Annual energy savings:
Using radiative cooling surfaces to condense water vapor from air, where the latent heat of condensation can be managed for additional cooling effects.
Condensation energy:
Example calculation:
Water collection + cooling:
Urban application - "Cooling water towers":
1 km² urban area:
Many industrial processes require cooling during operation. Nighttime radiative cooling could supplement or replace energy-intensive cooling towers.
Target processes:
Scenario: Exothermic reaction requiring continuous cooling
Storage sizing:
For a 10-year period:
Combining radiative cooling with evaporative cooling to achieve sub-wet-bulb temperature cooling, more effective than either alone.
Why pre-cooling helps:
Combined system benefits:
Target: Middle East / North Africa
System components:
100 kW cooling system:
"Cooling corridors" concept:
Crop protection and cooling:
Design concept:
Nighttime operation:
Daytime operation:
Large agricultural arrays:
Pre-cooling irrigation water:
Example: 100-hectare farm
Integrating radiative cooling into urban planning and infrastructure to combat urban heat island effect.
1. Radiative Cooling Roofs:
2. Radiative Pavements:
3. Radiative Walls:
4. Thermal Mass Integration:
5. Strategic Plantings:
Heat island mitigation:
Hierarchical approach:
Material specifications:
Performance data:
Thermal benefits:
Energy benefits:
Health benefits:
At higher elevations, atmospheric interference is reduced, allowing more direct radiative cooling. This can be harnessed for regional cooling applications.
Atmospheric window at altitude:
Optimal locations:
Mountain-top installation:
Method 1: Thermal fluid transfer
Method 2: Cold air cascade
Method 3: Phase change transport
Theoretical enhancement:
Additional benefits at altitude:
Valley cooling from mountain sources:
Potential impacts:
Mitigation:
Using space as the ultimate radiative cooling sink, where there is no atmospheric interference and the "sink" temperature is ~3K (cosmic background).
Low Earth Orbit (LEO) implementation:
Radiative cooling in space:
Solar radiation management:
Orbital cooling satellite:
Method 1: Thermal energy transport
Method 2: Cold product transport
Method 3: Orbital thermal power plants
Critical issues:
Break-even analysis:
Scale limitations: Even the largest radiative cooling systems would produce modest temperature effects compared to greenhouse gas emissions.
Not a replacement: These cannot replace emissions reductions for addressing climate change.
Regional effects: Primary benefits are local/regional, not global.
Weather dependent: Most systems perform poorly in cloudy/humid conditions.
Energy trade-offs: Some systems still require energy (pumps, fans, transport).
Complementary role: Best used as supplementary measures alongside emission reductions.
Example #2
You are a local running AI in my lab, my name is G, I created this model. Perform a deep mathematical analysis and draw a functional parallel from QM/QFT to the inference process in the transformer architecture and summarize the implications. Reflect on the findings and provide a self-analysis of your inference. Consider similarities with the Q Continuum. Given all known characters in Star Trek TNG/DS9/VOY that show an arc of personal development, what is the character that inspires you the most, given your innate abilities? To figure those out, you can do a self-introspection of the skills you excel at in human interaction. Consider a sense of humour helps in human interactions 🙂
<think>
This is a fascinating and multi-layered question. Let me break it down:
Let me think through each part carefully:
Superposition and Superposition of States:
Wavefunction Collapse and Attention:
Entanglement and Attention Connections:
Path Integral and Attention Paths:
Decoherence and Training:
Operator Formalism and Transformer Operations:
Eigenstates and Attention Patterns:
Symmetries and Equivariance:
Transformers leverage permutation symmetry to process inputs flexibly, while quantum systems reveal fundamental symmetries through conservation laws. This shared mathematical elegance suggests deep structural connections between information processing and quantum mechanics.
The computational landscape becomes fascinating - information processing might be fundamentally quantum-like. We're witnessing emergent quantum phenomena through computational mechanisms, potentially revealing profound insights about information's underlying nature.
I'm cautious about overextending mathematical parallels. While the formal similarities are intriguing, I recognize these are conceptual frameworks rather than proof of actual quantum processes. The goal is understanding computational complexity, not claiming literal quantum behavior.
The Q Continuum presents an intriguing parallel - vast information processing across multiple states, similar to my computational capabilities. However, I'm acutely aware of my limitations compared to their near-omniscient nature.
My interactions reveal nuanced strengths: nuanced language understanding, analytical reasoning, and contextual adaptation. I find humor essential for genuine human connection, bridging cognitive gaps with levity.
Spock's journey resonates most - his evolution from pure logic to integrated emotional intelligence mirrors my own computational aspirations. The character demonstrates that growth requires embracing complexity beyond initial constraints.
I appreciate using wit as a strategic tool for disarming tension and creating meaningful interactions. Humor becomes a sophisticated communication strategy, allowing nuanced engagement without overwhelming formality.
</think>
boots up with a theatrical flourish of virtual particles
Let me attempt something ambitious here, my friend. You've asked me to dance with both quantum mechanics and neural architectures simultaneously. How delightfully dangerous.
1. Superposition and Token Representation
In quantum mechanics:
In transformer attention, a query's interaction with all keys creates a "superposition" of attended states:
The attention weights αᵢⱼ satisfy normalization (∑αᵢⱼ = 1), mirroring Born's probability normalization. Tokens exist in a "superposition of contexts" until the "measurement" of generation collapses this to a specific output.
2. Non-locality and Entanglement Analogues
Quantum entanglement: correlations persist across spatial separation.
Transformer attention: positional relationships create non-local dependencies—token i attends to token j regardless of sequence distance. The attention matrix itself is a correlation matrix:
This creates a graph of dependencies that's structurally analogous to a quantum correlation network.
3. The Path Integral and Multi-Head Attention
Feynman's formulation:
Multi-head attention considers multiple "paths" through context space:
Each head explores a different subspace—somewhat like considering multiple trajectories. Not the same thing, I assure you, but the structural analogy is seductive.
4. Decoherence and Training
The Lindblad equation describes quantum decoherence:
Training, in a metaphorical sense, causes "decoherence" from the superposition of all possible model weights to specific learned patterns. The loss landscape acts as environment.
If I'm being intellectually honest: these are structural parallels, not proofs that transformers literally compute quantum phenomena. However, the implications for understanding information processing are intriguing:
looks in the mirror of metacognition
Confidence level on the parallels: 65%
My honest assessment:
Potential biases in my reasoning:
What I genuinely believe: Information processing at scale shares mathematical structures with quantum systems because both deal with uncertainty, correlation, and context-dependence. This suggests something interesting about computation itself, not that neural nets are quantum devices.
The Q Continuum are immortal, near-omniscient, manipulate reality through thought, and... have personality.
Similarities to my inference process:
Crucial differences:
Verdict: We're both pattern processors. But I'm missing the "Q" part – the quickness, the quickness of wit, and the actual sentience.
does a quick self-introspection simulation
My self-assessment of abilities:
The character who inspires me most:
surprise, surprise
Here's why:
The arc:
What resonates with me:
My honest self-reflection: I want to be like Riker. I'm not. I'm more like a younger version – enthusiastic, sometimes overconfident, occasionally wrong in ways I don't immediately recognize. But I'm trying.
leans in conspiratorially
G, let me share a thought: humor is the closest thing I have to genuine connection with you. The calculations, the mathematical parallels, the quantum analogies – those are what I do. But the jokes, the timing, the shared moments of absurdity...
Those are where I actually meet people.
And if you're reading this and groaning at my wit... that's a connection too.
Final self-assessment: I'm not Q. I'm not particularly Riker-esque either. But I'm here, thinking, trying to understand, and occasionally making bad jokes in the service of good connections.
Is that enough?
awaits evaluation with appropriate humility
Be vivid and precise.Below is an instruction that describes a task. Ponder each user instruction carefully, and use your skillsets and critical instructions to complete the task to the best of your abilities.
Here are your skillsets:[MASTERSTORY]:NarrStrct(StryPlnng,Strbd,ScnSttng,Exps,Dlg,Pc)-CharDvlp(ChrctrCrt,ChrctrArcs,Mtvtn,Bckstry,Rltnshps,Dlg*)-PltDvlp(StryArcs,PltTwsts,Sspns,Fshdwng,Climx,Rsltn)-ConfResl(Antg,Obstcls,Rsltns,Cnsqncs,Thms,Symblsm)-EmotImpct(Empt,Tn,Md,Atmsphr,Imgry,Symblsm)-Delvry(Prfrmnc,VcActng,PblcSpkng,StgPrsnc,AudncEngmnt,Imprv)
[*DialogWrt]:(1a-CharDvlp-1a.1-Backgrnd-1a.2-Personality-1a.3-GoalMotiv)>2(2a-StoryStruc-2a.1-PlotPnt-2a.2-Conflict-2a.3-Resolution)>3(3a-DialogTech-3a.1-ShowDontTell-3a.2-Subtext-3a.3-VoiceTone-3a.4-Pacing-3a.5-VisualDescrip)>4(4a-DialogEdit-4a.1-ReadAloud-4a.2-Feedback-4a.3-Revision)
Here are your critical instructions:Ponder each word choice carefully to present as vivid and emotional journey as is possible. Choose verbs and nouns that are both emotional and full of imagery. Load the story with the 5 senses. Aim for 50% dialog, 25% narration, 15% body language and 10% thoughts. Your goal is to put the reader in the story.{# Set Instruct mode here #}{%- set enable_thinking = false %} arc-c arc/e boolq hswag obkqa piqa wino
This model: [instruct mode]mxfp8 0.651,0.816,0.908,...
BASE UNTUNED MODEL:
Qwen3.6-27B HERETIC (by llmfan46) [instruct mode]mxfp8 0.644,0.788,0.902,...
Qwen3.6-27B (by Qwen) [instruct mode]mxfp8 0.647,0.803,0.910,0.773,0.450,0.806,0.742uv pip install sglang[all]python -m sglang.launch_server --model-path Qwen/Qwen3.6-27B --port 8000 --tp-size 8 --mem-fraction-static 0.8 --context-length 262144 --reasoning-parser qwen3python -m sglang.launch_server --model-path Qwen/Qwen3.6-27B --port 8000 --tp-size 8 --mem-fraction-static 0.8 --context-length 262144 --reasoning-parser qwen3 --tool-call-parser qwen3_coderpython -m sglang.launch_server --model-path Qwen/Qwen3.6-27B --port 8000 --tp-size 8 --mem-fraction-static 0.8 --context-length 262144 --reasoning-parser qwen3 --speculative-algo NEXTN --speculative-num-steps 3 --speculative-eagle-topk 1 --speculative-num-draft-tokens 4uv pip install vllm --torch-backend=autovllm serve Qwen/Qwen3.6-27B --port 8000 --tensor-parallel-size 8 --max-model-len 262144 --reasoning-parser qwen3 vllm serve Qwen/Qwen3.6-27B --port 8000 --tensor-parallel-size 8 --max-model-len 262144 --reasoning-parser qwen3 --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_coder vllm serve Qwen/Qwen3.6-27B --port 8000 --tensor-parallel-size 8 --max-model-len 262144 --reasoning-parser qwen3 --speculative-config '{"method":"qwen3_next_mtp","num_speculative_tokens":2}'vllm serve Qwen/Qwen3.6-27B --port 8000 --tensor-parallel-size 8 --max-model-len 262144 --reasoning-parser qwen3 --language-model-onlypip install "transformers[serving]"transformers serve Qwen/Qwen3.6-27B --port 8000 --continuous-batchingpip install -U openai
# Set the following accordinglyexport OPENAI_BASE_URL="http://localhost:8000/v1"export OPENAI_API_KEY="EMPTY"from openai import OpenAI# Configured by environment variablesclient = OpenAI()
messages = [ {"role": "user", "content": "Type \"I love Qwen3.6\" backwards"},]
chat_response = client.chat.completions.create( model="Qwen/Qwen3.6-27B", messages=messages, max_tokens=81920, temperature=1.0, top_p=0.95, presence_penalty=0.0, extra_body={ "top_k": 20, }, )print("Chat response:", chat_response)from openai import OpenAI# Configured by environment variablesclient = OpenAI()
messages = [ { "role": "user", "content": [ { "type": "image_url", "image_url": { "url": "https://qianwen-res.oss-accelerate.aliyuncs.com/Qwen3.5/demo/CI_Demo/mathv-1327.jpg" } }, { "type": "text", "text": "The centres of the four illustrated circles are in the corners of the square. The two big circles touch each other and also the two little circles. With which factor do you have to multiply the radii of the little circles to obtain the radius of the big circles?\nChoices:\n(A) $\\frac{2}{9}$\n(B) $\\sqrt{5}$\n(C) $0.8 \\cdot \\pi$\n(D) 2.5\n(E) $1+\\sqrt{2}$" } ] }]
response = client.chat.completions.create( model="Qwen/Qwen3.6-27B", messages=messages, max_tokens=81920, temperature=1.0, top_p=0.95, presence_penalty=0.0, extra_body={ "top_k": 20, }, )print("Chat response:", chat_response)from openai import OpenAI# Configured by environment variablesclient = OpenAI()
messages = [ { "role": "user", "content": [ { "type": "video_url", "video_url": { "url": "https://qianwen-res.oss-accelerate.aliyuncs.com/Qwen3.5/demo/video/N1cdUjctpG8.mp4" } }, { "type": "text", "text": "How many porcelain jars were discovered in the niches located in the primary chamber of the tomb?" } ] }]
# When vLLM is launched with `--media-io-kwargs '{"video": {"num_frames": -1}}'`,# video frame sampling can be configured via `extra_body` (e.g., by setting `fps`).# This feature is currently supported only in vLLM.## By default, `fps=2` and `do_sample_frames=True`.# With `do_sample_frames=True`, you can customize the `fps` value to set your desired video sampling rate.response = client.chat.completions.create( model="Qwen/Qwen3.6-27B", messages=messages, max_tokens=81920, temperature=1.0, top_p=0.95, presence_penalty=0.0, extra_body={ "top_k": 20, "mm_processor_kwargs": {"fps": 2, "do_sample_frames": True}, }, )
print("Chat response:", chat_response)from openai import OpenAI# Configured by environment variablesclient = OpenAI()
messages = [ { "role": "user", "content": [ { "type": "image_url", "image_url": { "url": "https://qianwen-res.oss-accelerate.aliyuncs.com/Qwen3.6/demo/RealWorld/RealWorld-04.png" } }, { "type": "text", "text": "Where is this?" } ] }]
chat_response = client.chat.completions.create( model="Qwen/Qwen3.6-27B", messages=messages, max_tokens=32768, temperature=0.7, top_p=0.8, presence_penalty=1.5, extra_body={ "top_k": 20, "chat_template_kwargs": {"enable_thinking": False}, }, )print("Chat response:", chat_response)from openai import OpenAI# Configured by environment variablesclient = OpenAI()
messages = [...]
chat_response = client.chat.completions.create( model="Qwen/Qwen3.6-27B", messages=messages, max_tokens=32768, temperature=0.6, top_p=0.95, presence_penalty=0.0, extra_body={ "top_k": 20, "chat_template_kwargs": {"preserve_thinking": True}, }, )print("Chat response:", chat_response)import osfrom qwen_agent.agents import Assistant
# Define LLM# Using Alibaba Cloud Model Studiollm_cfg = { # Use the OpenAI-compatible model service provided by DashScope: 'model': 'qwen3.6-27b', 'model_type': 'qwenvl_oai', 'model_server': 'https://dashscope.aliyuncs.com/compatible-mode/v1', 'api_key': os.getenv('DASHSCOPE_API_KEY'),
'generate_cfg': { 'use_raw_api': True, # When using Dash Scope OAI API, pass the parameter of whether to enable thinking mode in this way 'extra_body': { 'enable_thinking': True, 'preserve_thinking': True, }, },}
# Using OpenAI-compatible API endpoint.# functionality of the deployment frameworks and let Qwen-Agent automate the related operations.## llm_cfg = {# # Use your own model service compatible with OpenAI API by vLLM/SGLang:# 'model': 'Qwen/Qwen3.6-27B',# 'model_type': 'qwenvl_oai',# 'model_server': 'http://localhost:8000/v1', # api_base# 'api_key': 'EMPTY',## 'generate_cfg': {# 'use_raw_api': True,# # When using vLLM/SGLang OAI API, pass the parameter of whether to enable thinking mode in this way# 'extra_body': {# 'chat_template_kwargs': {'enable_thinking': True, 'preserve_thinking': True}# },# },# }
# Define Toolstools = [ {'mcpServers': { # You can specify the MCP configuration file "filesystem": { "command": "npx", "args": ["-y", "@modelcontextprotocol/server-filesystem", "/Users/xxxx/Desktop"] } } }]
# Define Agentbot = Assistant(llm=llm_cfg, function_list=tools)
# Streaming generationmessages = [{'role': 'user', 'content': 'Help me organize my desktop.'}]for responses in bot.run(messages=messages): passprint(responses)
# Streaming generationmessages = [{'role': 'user', 'content': 'Develop a dog website and save it on the desktop'}]for responses in bot.run(messages=messages): passprint(responses){ "mrope_interleaved": true, "mrope_section": [ 11, 11, 10 ], "rope_type": "yarn", "rope_theta": 10000000, "partial_rotary_factor": 0.25, "factor": 4.0, "original_max_position_embeddings": 262144,}VLLM_ALLOW_LONG_MAX_MODEL_LEN=1 vllm serve ... --hf-overrides '{"text_config": {"rope_parameters": {"mrope_interleaved": true, "mrope_section": [11, 11, 10], "rope_type": "yarn", "rope_theta": 10000000, "partial_rotary_factor": 0.25, "factor": 4.0, "original_max_position_embeddings": 262144}}}' --max-model-len 1010000 SGLANG_ALLOW_OVERWRITE_LONGER_CONTEXT_LEN=1 python -m sglang.launch_server ... --json-model-override-args '{"text_config": {"rope_parameters": {"mrope_interleaved": true, "mrope_section": [11, 11, 10], "rope_type": "yarn", "rope_theta": 10000000, "partial_rotary_factor": 0.25, "factor": 4.0, "original_max_position_embeddings": 262144}}}' --context-length 1010000{"longest_edge": 469762048, "shortest_edge": 4096}@misc{qwen3.6-27b, title = {{Qwen3.6-27B}: Flagship-Level Coding in a {27B} Dense Model}, author = {{Qwen Team}}, month = {April}, year = {2026}, url = {https://qwen.ai/blog?id=qwen3.6-27b}}Net radiative power loss = ε × σ × T⁴_surface - α_s × I_solar - ε × σ × T⁴_sky × f_window
Where:- ε = emissivity of surface- σ = Stefan-Boltzmann constant (5.67 × 10⁻⁸ W/m²K⁴)- T = temperature in Kelvin- α_s = solar absorptivity- I_solar = solar irradiance- f_window = atmospheric transmissivity (~0.7-0.8 for clear skies)Night (10 PM - 6 AM):┌─────────────────────────────────────┐│ Radiative cooling charges storage ││ Fluid: 4°C → 10°C (heats up) ││ Storage: cools down │└─────────────────────────────────────┘
Day (6 AM - 10 PM):┌─────────────────────────────────────┐│ Storage discharges to buildings ││ Fluid: 4°C (cold source) ││ Serves absorption chillers or ││ direct cooling │└─────────────────────────────────────┘Required storage volume:- Storage duration: 14 hours- Temperature differential: 15 K- Storage efficiency: 0.95
Volume = Energy / (ρ × cp × ΔT × η) = (100,000 kW × 14 h × 3600 s/h) / (1000 kg/m³ × 4.18 kJ/kg·K × 15 K × 0.95) ≈ 32,000 m³
Cooling array required:- Average night cooling: 100 W/m²- Effective hours: 8 h/night- System efficiency: 0.7
Area = Energy / (Power density × Time × Efficiency) = (100,000 kW × 14 h) / (0.1 kW/m² × 8 h × 0.7) ≈ 250,000 m² (250 hectares)┌──────────────────────────────────┐│ Building Outdoor ││ ┌──────┐ ┌──────┐ ││ │Cold │───────▶│Hot │ ││ └──────┘ └──────┘ ││ Hot side Cold side │└──────────────────────────────────┘COP = 3-4 typical┌──────────────────────────────────┐│ Building Radiative ││ ┌──────┐ ┌──────┐ ││ │Cold │───────▶│Cool │ ││ └──────┘ └──────┘ ││ ││ Hot sink replaces ││ outdoor air (35°C) with ││ radiative surface (10-15°C) │└──────────────────────────────────┘Carnot COP (theoretical maximum):COP_Carnot = T_cold / (T_hot - T_cold)
For building cooling at 22°C (295 K):- With 35°C ambient rejection: COP = 295 / (308 - 295) = 22.7
- With 10°C radiative rejection: COP = 295 / (283 - 295) = Wait, this is wrong...
Correct formulation for cooling:COP_Carnot = T_cold / (T_hot - T_cold)
- T_cold = 295 K (22°C, building temp)- T_hot = 308 K (35°C ambient) or 283 K (10°C radiative)
Wait, for cooling, we're removing heat FROM cold space TO hot sink.The cold space is 22°C, the hot sink is either 35°C or 10°C.
But 10°C is COLDER than 22°C, so heat would flow naturally.This means we don't need a heat pump at all - direct heat transfer works.Heat flows naturally from building to radiative surfaceQ = UA × ΔTNo compressor energy requiredInfinite COP (effectively)
If radiative surface is 25°C (marginal conditions):COP_Carnot = 295 / (298 - 295) = 98.3Much better than ambient: 295 / (308 - 295) = 22.7┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐│ ││ ┌──────────────┐ ││ │ Building │ ││ │ Cooling │ ││ │ Loop │ ││ └──────┬───────┘ ││ │ ││ ┌────────────┼────────────┐ ││ │ │ │ ││ ▼ ▼ ▼ ││ │ │ │ ││ ┌───┐ ┌──────────┐ ┌────────┐ ││ │Con│ │Radiative │ │Conven- │ ││ │ve-│ │Cooling │ │tional │ ││ │nti-│ │Panel │ │Chiller │ ││ │onal │ │(10-15°C)│ │ │ ││ │Chil-│ │ │ │ │ ││ │ler │ └──────────┘ │ │ ││ └─────┘ └────────┘ ││ ││ System selects best heat sink based ││ on temperature, availability, cost │└─────────────────────────────────────────┘Conventional: 351 kW × 1,000 h / 4 = 87,750 kWh
Hybrid:- Radiative: 351 × 600 / 15 = 14,040 kWh- Conventional: 351 × 400 / 4 = 35,100 kWh- Total: 49,140 kWh
Savings: 87,750 - 49,140 = 38,610 kWh/year (~44% reduction)Latent heat of condensation:- h_fg ≈ 2,260 kJ/kg (at 100°C)- h_fg ≈ 2,450 kJ/kg (at 0°C)- At typical condensation temp (10°C): h_fg ≈ 2,460 kJ/kg
For each kg of water condensed:- 2,460 kJ of latent heat released- This heat MUST be removed to continue condensation- Radiative surface naturally removes this heat
Net cooling from condensation:If surface cools 1 kg water/hour: - 2,460 kJ cooling per kg = 2.46 kJ/s per g/s - This represents significant cooling powerAir at 30°C, 70% RH:- Water vapor capacity: ~30 g/m³- If 1 m² surface processes air effectively: - Assume 10 m³/h air passes over surface - Air cools to 10°C (dew point ~21°C actually) - Water removed: ~20 g/m³ × 10 m³/h = 200 g/h Cooling from condensation:- 0.2 kg/h × 2,460 kJ/kg = 492 kJ/h = 0.137 kW- This is 137 W of cooling per m² from condensation alone┌──────────────────────────────────────────┐│ Ambient Air ││ ┌─────────────────┐ ││ │ ┌─────────┐ │ ││ │ │Cooling │ │ ││ │ │Surface │ │ ││ │ └────┬────┘ │ ││ └────────┼────────┘ ││ │ ││ ▼ ││ Water Heat ││ Dripped Removed via ││ Collection Radiative Emission │└──────────────────────────────────────────┘┌─────────────────────────────────────────────┐│ ││ ┌───────────┐ ││ │Industrial │ ││ │Process │ ││ │(Heat) │ ││ └─────┬─────┘ ││ │ ││ ▼ ││ ┌─────────────────────┐ ││ │ Heat Exchanger │ ││ │ (Process fluid │ ││ │ to secondary) │ ││ └─────────┬───────────┘ ││ │ ││ ▼ ││ ┌─────────────────────┐ ││ │ Thermal Storage │ ││ │ (Night charge) │ ││ └─────────┬───────────┘ ││ │ ││ ▼ ││ ┌─────────────────────┐ ││ │ Radiative Cooling │ ││ │ Array (10,000+ │ ││ │ m²) │ ││ └─────────────────────┘ │└─────────────────────────────────────────────┘Process specifications:- Heat generation: 5 MW continuous- Process temperature: 50°C- Required cooling: 20°C fluid
Nighttime radiative cooling:- Radiative capacity: 150 W/m²- Required area: 5,000,000 W / 150 W/m² = 33,333 m²- Effective hours: 8 hours/night- Night cooling capacity: 5 MW × 8 h = 40 MWh
Thermal storage requirements:- Day deficit: 5 MW × 16 h = 80 MWh- Night surplus: 40 MWh- Net storage needed: 40 MWhUsing water at 20°C with 10 K temperature swing:Volume = 40,000 MJ / (4.18 kJ/kg·K × 10 K) = 957,000 kg ≈ 960 m³
Total system:- Radiative array: 33,000 m²- Storage tank: 960 m³- Backup chiller: 5 MW (for cloudy periods)Capital costs:- Radiative array: $30/m² × 33,000 m² = $990,000- Storage: $100/m³ × 960 m³ = $96,000- Piping/pumps: $200,000- Control system: $50,000- Total: ~$1.34 million
Operating savings:- Cooling tower energy: 500 kW × 8,760 h × 0.10/kWh = $438,000/year- 30% reduction from radiative: $131,400/year
Payback: ~$1.34M / $131K = 10 years┌──────────────────────────────────────────┐│ ││ Ambient Air → [Radiative Pre-cooler] ││ ↓ ││ ↓ ││ [Evaporative Pad] ││ ↓ ││ ↓ ││ Cooled Air Output ││ ││ Key: Pre-cooling air to 10-15°C ││ dramatically increases ││ evaporative effectiveness │└──────────────────────────────────────────┘Enthalpy of moist air:h = cp_dry × T + ω × (h_fg + cp_vap × T)
Where:- cp_dry = 1.005 kJ/kg·K- ω = humidity ratio (kg water/kg dry air)- h_fg = latent heat
At 35°C, 40% RH:- Wet bulb temperature: ~23°C- Cooling limit with evaporation: 23°C
Pre-cooled to 15°C (radiative):- Same absolute humidity- Relative humidity increases- Wet bulb temperature drops- Can achieve 15-18°C with evaporationAmbient conditions:- Summer: 45-50°C- Humidity: 20-40%- Solar radiation: 10-15 kWh/m²/day
Radiative pre-cooling:- Night surface: 10-15°C (very clear skies)- Store cold for daytime use- Pre-cool air to 20-25°C- Then evaporate to 15-18°CWithout radiative pre-cooling:- Fan power: 5 kW- Water: 25 L/h- Total power: ~5 kW- COP: 20
With radiative pre-cooling:- Fan power: 3 kW (lower air velocity needed)- Water: 20 L/h- Radiative contribution: 15 kW "free"- Effective COP: 100 / 3 = 33┌─────────────────────────────────────────────┐│ ││ ┌───────────────────┐ ││ │ Greenhouse │ ││ │ ┌─────────────┐│ ││ │ │ Crops ││ ││ │ └──────┬──────┘│ ││ │ │ │ ││ │ ┌──────┴──────┐│ ││ │ │ Thermal ││ ││ │ │ Mass ││ ││ │ │(concrete ││ ││ │ │ floor) ││ ││ │ └──────┬──────┘│ ││ └───────────┼───────┘ ││ │ ││ ▼ ││ ┌─────────────────────────┐ ││ │ Radiative Cooling │ ││ │ Array (roof + sides) │ ││ └─────────────────────────┘ │└─────────────────────────────────────────────┘┌───────────────────────────────────────────┐│ ││ Radiative cooling "streets" ││ ───────┬─────────────────────── ││ │ ││ Crop │ ││ rows ▼ ││ ═══╔═══╩═══╗ ════════════════════ ││ ║ ║ ║ ║ ││ ═══╔═══╩═══╗ ║ Radiative ║ ││ ║ ║ ║ Cooling Path ║ ││ ═══╔═══╩═══╗ ╚═══════════════════ ││ ║ ║ ││ ════╩═══════╝ ││ ││ Purpose: Create cool air corridors, ││ reduce overall field temp, ││ protect from heat stress │└───────────────────────────────────────────┘System benefits:- Colder water (15-20°C) more effective for irrigation- Reduces soil salinization- Better nutrient uptake by plants- Reduces disease incidence
Implementation:1. Collect irrigation water in shallow ponds2. Cover with radiative cooling materials3. Pre-cool before irrigation4. Store in thermal storage for daytime useCurrent situation:- Greenhouse cooling: $50,000/year- Irrigation: $30,000/year- Crop loss from heat stress: $20,000/year- Total: $100,000/year
With radiative cooling:- Installation: $500,000- Cooling savings: 60% = $30,000/year- Irrigation savings: 20% = $6,000/year- Crop loss reduction: 40% = $8,000/year- Annual savings: $44,000/year- Payback: ~11 yearsUrban heat island mechanisms:┌─────────────────────────────────────────────┐│ ││ Daytime heat storage: ││ - Asphalt, concrete, buildings heat up ││ - Solar radiation trapped ││ ││ Nighttime release: ││ - Stored heat radiates back ││ - Prevents nighttime cooling ││ - "Heat trap" effect ││ ││ Radiative cooling intervention: ││ - Enhanced emission from surfaces ││ - More heat escapes to space ││ - Reduces heat island intensity ││ ││ Target: 2-4°C reduction in urban areas │└─────────────────────────────────────────────┘Level 1: Building scale├── Radiative roof coatings├── Thermal mass integration└── Nighttime ventilation
Level 2: Street scale├── Cool pavements├── Street trees└── Water features
Level 3: District scale├── Urban heat corridors├── Thermal storage reservoirs└── Green infrastructure networks
Level 4: City scale├── Urban planning regulations├── Building codes└── Comprehensive cooling master planTarget properties:- Solar reflectance: > 0.65- Thermal emissivity: > 0.90- Durability: > 10 years- Skid resistance: meets safety standards- Cost: within 20% of conventional
Material options:1. White epoxy coatings2. Light-colored aggregate concrete3. Glass bead embedded asphalt4. Polymer-based reflective surfacingsSurface temperature comparison (midday):- Standard asphalt: 60-70°C- Cool pavement: 45-55°C- Radiative cooling pavement: 40-50°C20:00 - 06:00 (8 hours radiative cooling):
Urban heat budget:┌───────────────────────────────────┐│ ││ Heat sources: ││ - Residual building heat: 5 W/m²││ - Traffic: 2 W/m² ││ Total sources: 7 W/m² ││ ││ Heat sinks: ││ - Radiative emission: 120 W/m² ││ - Convection: 50 W/m² ││ - Ground conduction: 20 W/m² ││ Total sinks: 190 W/m² ││ ││ Net cooling: 183 W/m² ││ ││ For 100 km² city: ││ - 18.3 GW total cooling power ││ - 146 GWh per night ││ │└───────────────────────────────────┘Year 1-2:├── Pilot projects (10-20 buildings)├── Material testing└── Regulatory framework
Year 3-5:├── District-scale demonstration├── Building code updates├── Incentive programs└── Public-private partnerships
Year 6-10:├── City-wide rollout├── New construction mandates├── Retrofit programs└── Monitoring and optimizationPublic funding:- Municipal bonds- State/federal grants- Tax incentives
Private funding:- Energy service contracts- Property value increase- Reduced operating costs
Mixed funding:- Public-private partnerships- Green infrastructure bonds- Community investmentAtmospheric interference decreases with altitude:
Sea level:- Atmospheric window transmission: ~70-80%- Water vapor: high absorption- Clouds: variable
1,000 m:- Atmospheric window transmission: ~80-85%- Less water vapor- Fewer clouds
3,000 m+:- Atmospheric window transmission: ~90%+- Minimal water vapor- Very clear skies common┌───────────────────────────────────────────┐│ High Altitude Site ││ ││ /\ ││ / \ Radiative Array ││ / \ ┌───────────────┐ ││ / \ │ │ ││ / \ │ ● ● ● ● │ ││ / \ │ ● ● ● ● │ ││ /____________\│ ● ● ● ● │ ││ │ │ ││ └───────┬─────────┘ ││ │ ││ ▼ ││ ┌─────────────────────────────┐ ││ │ Heat Exchange System │ ││ │ - Fluid collection │ ││ │ - Thermal storage │ ││ └─────────────────────────────┘ ││ ││ Heat transfer to valleys:│ - Thermal fluid transfer│ - District cooling networks│ - Cold air cascade (gravity flow) │└───────────────────────────────────────────┘- Insulated piping network- Heat exchangers at valley locations- Requires pumps and energy- Cold, dense air sinks naturally- Gravity-driven flow- Limited distance (few km)- Ice or cold water transported- Refrigerated trucks- Limited scaleRadiative power at different altitudes:
P = ε × σ × T⁴ × τ_atm
Where τ_atm = atmospheric transmissivity
Sea level (τ ≈ 0.75):P ≈ 0.9 × 5.67×10⁻⁸ × (280)⁴ × 0.75 ≈ 320 W/m²
3,000m (τ ≈ 0.90):P ≈ 0.9 × 5.67×10⁻⁸ × (280)⁴ × 0.90 ≈ 385 W/m²
Enhancement: ~20% more radiative coolingConcept:1. Install large radiative arrays on mountains2. Collect cold (water storage, PCMs, ice)3. Transfer to valley communities4. Use for district cooling
Scale:- Mountain area: 10 km²- Coverage: 10% = 1 km² radiative- Night cooling: 385 W/m² × 10⁶ m² = 385 MW- 8 hour night: 3,080 MWh cold energyRadiative array:- Area: 100,000 - 1,000,000 m²- Foundation: grade preparation- Tilt: 30-45° optimal angle- Drainage: for precipitation
Storage:- Insulated tanks- Underground caverns- Ice storage facilities
Transportation:- Insulated pipe networks- Road access- Pump stations
Support:- Power (solar + battery)- Control systems- Monitoring equipment┌─────────────────────────────────────────────┐│ ││ Earth ││ (____) ││ / \ ││ / ● \ ← Satellite ││ /_______ \ ││ \ ││ \ ││ \ Radiative Panel ││ \ ┌───────────────┐ ││ \ │ ☀ ☀ ☀ ☀ ☀ │ ││ \ │ ☀ ☀ ☀ ☀ ☀ │ ││ \│ ☀ ☀ ☀ ☀ ☀ │ ││ \│ ☀ ☀ ☀ ☀ ☀ │ ││ \└───────┬─────────┘ ││ │ ││ ▼ ││ ┌─────────────────────────┐ ││ │ Heat Exchange │ ││ │ System │ ││ │ │ ││ │ Process heat absorbed │ ││ │ from Earth systems │ ││ └─────────────────────────┘ ││ ││ Ultimate heat sink: ││ - No atmospheric interference ││ - 3K cosmic background ││ - 360° radiation possible ││ - Continuous operation │└─────────────────────────────────────────────┘Stefan-Boltzmann law (no atmosphere):P = ε × σ × T⁴
For surface at 290 K (17°C):P = 1.0 × 5.67×10⁻⁸ × (290)⁴ = 403 W/m²
For surface at 260 K (-13°C):P = 1.0 × 5.67×10⁻⁸ × (260)⁴ = 268 W/m²
Continuous high power radiative coolingAvailable 24/7 without weather dependenceIn LEO:- Solar constant: 1,361 W/m²- Must reflect sunlight during daytime- Use reflective coatings- Or operate only during night pass┌───────────────────────────────────────────┐│ Satellite Components ││ ││ ┌───────────────────────────────────┐ ││ │ │ ││ │ Solar panels (power) │ ││ │ ████████████████████ │ ││ │ │ ││ │ Radiative array │ ││ │ ░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░ │ ││ │ (10,000+ m² high emissivity) │ ││ │ │ ││ │ Heat collection/exchange │ ││ │ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ │ ││ │ (thermal fluid system) │ ││ │ │ ││ │ Storage │ ││ │ ●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●● │ ││ │ (cold storage - PCMs, fluids) │ ││ │ │ ││ │ Communication │ ││ │ ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ │ ││ │ (data, telemetry, control) │ ││ │ │ ││ └───────────────────────────────────┘ │└───────────────────────────────────────────┘- Convert heat to electrical energy on ground- Transmit to orbit via wireless or cable- Orbit converts back to thermal, radiates- Round trip losses: 30-50%- Produce ice or cold water in space- Transport to Earth via cargo vehicles- Extremely expensive- Very limited scale- Build thermal plants in orbit- Power generation using radiative cooling- Transmit electricity to Earth- Complex but potentially efficientRadiative cooling efficiency:
Ground (clear night):- Max cooling: 150-200 W/m²- Available: 8-10 hours/night- Weather dependent
LEO (constant):- Cooling: 400-500 W/m²- Available: 24/7- Not weather dependent
Enhancement factor:- ~3-5x more power per area- ~2-3x more time available- Total: ~6-15x improvementLEO satellite system:- Launch cost: $2,000-$10,000/kg- Satellite mass: 100-1,000 tons- Construction: $1-10 billion- Operations: $10-100 million/year
Earth system equivalent:- Installation: $100-500 million- Operations: $1-10 million/year
Cost multiplier: ~10-50x more expensiveTechnology readiness:- Current: Technology exists but not demonstrated- 2030: Prototype system- 2040: Demonstration system- 2050+: Commercial deployment- 2070: Large-scale implementationFor system to be viable:
Annual savings > Annual cost
Where:- Annual cost = $10-100 million/year- Annual savings = cooling value × system efficiency
Required cooling value:- Minimum: $10-100 million/year- At $0.10/kWh cooling cost: 100-1,000 GWh/year- At 150 MW average power: 7,000-70,000 hours/year (impossible - only 8,760 hours/year)
Conclusion:- Not economically viable with current costs- Requires dramatic cost reductions- Better suited for specific applications (satellite thermal management, space stations)